Case documentation: Lactose intolerance since 2003 (breath test)

Clinical diagnosis: lactose intolerance since 2003 (breath test)

Patient code: K.S. Age: 24 y Gender: female Profession: optician

Start of treatment: 26.10.2006 End of treatment: 04.12.2006

Brief medical history (main symptom): Recurrence. Diarrhea and nausea; currently avoidance strategy; allergies: Apple; father probably also lactose intolerant

Brief findings (e.g. laboratory, EAP, BETA):

EAP: Ly re 58, Pa re 58, Le re 57, Mare 57, Lu li 60, Le li 58;

Bioresonance intolerance test: lactose on Ly, Lu, Le re positive; intolerance pre-test and fungal test negative; tests using software S I

Course of therapy and therapeutic measures:

Avoid lactose as far as possible;

  • 26.10.: Biohyper + Program 254 MTl: Lactose in the original;
  • 31.10: ditto;
  • 7.11.: Biohyper + program 254 MTl: lactose in the original + MedTest therapy D 100 lactose, immediately after the therapy and on the following day diffuse, mild abdominal cramps and diarrhea (assessment);
  • 9.11.: Biohyper + Program 254 MT 1: Lactose in the original;
  • 17.11: Bio hyper+ program 254 MTl: Lactose in the original + MedTest-Therapy D400 Lactose;
  • 27.11.: Biohyper + Program 254 MTl: Lactose in the original+ MedTest-Therapy Dl00 Lactose;
  • 4.12.: Biohyper + program 254 MTl: lactose in the original + MedTest-Therapy D100 lactose, EAP intake: without findings;

Call on 26.02.2007: Since the end of the treatment series, KS no longer has any problems with the intake of lactose-containing foods. In May 2007, KS's sister reported that she was still symptom-free.

Side effects and intolerances: none

Were other therapeutic measures (e.g. medication) also used?

Which one? No

Assessment of the therapeutic effectiveness of MORA therapy (check all that apply):

very good (x) good ( ) satisfactory ( ) unsatisfactory ( )

Remark

Case documentation is created by therapists who work with BioKat devices. They reflect the possibilities that can be achieved with this type of therapy. However, this does not mean that the same effect can be repeated in individual cases for other patients with the same symptoms. Case documentation serves as an aid for other therapists to gain insight into a method they are unfamiliar with and to learn about new therapeutic approaches.